DayOne+ Value

De-risking a compliance-sensitive aerospace carve-out.

A four-country aerospace divestiture where CUI handling and CMMC / NIST 800-171 obligations had to be preserved from Day 1, not bolted on afterwards.

Engagement
PE-backed divestiture · Aerospace manufacturing · US, UK, APAC
Programme
DayOne+ M&A Tech Advisory
Engineer inspecting a jet engine assembly in an aerospace hangar
Measurable outcomes

What changed, in numbers.

4
Countries co-ordinated across US, UK, Malaysia and Thailand
Day 1
Continuity plan covering identity, email, licensing, SFTP and LMS
GCC-aware
Tenant and collaboration design mapped to CMMC and NIST 800-171
The challenge

Where the engagement started.

A newly independent aerospace manufacturing group needed to separate from its former parent across the US, UK, Malaysia and Thailand. Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) handling, CMMC and NIST 800-171 obligations sat at the centre of the transaction. Identity, email, licensing, secure file transfer and the learning platform all had to be operational at change of control, in a design that a future US federal auditor would accept.

Our approach

How the work was sequenced.

  1. 01Technology separation advisory ran alongside the legal separation, not behind it.
  2. 02Day 1 readiness was framed against CMMC / NIST 800-171 boundaries, not generic IT checklists.
  3. 03Tenant and collaboration design was GCC-aware, with a documented data-boundary story.
  4. 04IT/OT discovery captured shop-floor and lab systems that would have been invisible from head office.
What we delivered

What the client was left with.

  • Multi-tenant collaboration design across four countries with clear CUI boundaries.
  • Day 1 continuity plan covering identity, email, licensing, SFTP and the learning management system.
  • IT and OT discovery record used to inform the value-creation roadmap post-completion.
  • Governance pack accepted by the sponsor and retained beyond Day 1 into ongoing oversight.

Compliance risk was on the table from day one, not bolted on afterwards. That is why the sponsor kept us in the seat post-completion.

Programme Director, PE-backed aerospace group
Full case study

The full narrative, sequencing and lessons, as a PDF.

The PDF covers the challenge, the approach, everything we delivered, measurable outcomes and the lessons the DayOne+ team took from the engagement. No form, no gate. All names, sectors and identifying details have been removed.

Lessons in the PDF

What the team took away.

  • Compliance risk in aerospace carve-outs is a Day 1 problem, not a Day 90 problem.
  • Cross-border collaboration design decides whether CUI stays inside the boundary or not.
  • The sponsor keeps the adviser who owned the risk in the seat post-completion.